Page 1 of 1
Love Boat (Bush+Musharraf)
Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2005 9:44 am
by Umer
We need to send Bush (big bitch) and Musharraf (small bitch) on a love boat to an unknown Island and then call airstrikes on them.
http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.as ... 2005_pg1_3
F-16s for cooperation against Iran?
LAHORE: Pakistan could have agreed to host US troops and intelligence assets near its border with Iran in preparation for a possible attack on Iran, including training US forces in Karachi, Asia Times Online reports. ATO said the real interest in Wednesday’s meeting between President Musharraf and Condoleezza Rice centered on Iran. Before Rice’s visit to India, Pakistan and Afghanistan, Washington was abuzz with talk that the US had convinced President Musharraf to lend support to US action against Iran for its alleged nuclear programme, ATO said. It reported that in return, the US seemed to be more receptive to Pakistan’s long-term request for F-16 fighter aircraft. Rice thanked Musharraf for “superb support in the war on terror”, ATO quoted State Department spokesman Richard Boucher as saying. The possible sale of F-16 fighter planes came up, Boucher said, but he gave no details, ATO reported. daily times monitor
Motherfreak only wants F16s to have US kill more muslims. He's a bitch just like his master Bush (Bigger bitch).
Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2005 1:16 am
by Umer
yea, he's still not as freaking crazy as bush but he's a sell out, actually the economy under him has been better since he came into power and he's actually pretty stable in the head, still a sellout bitch, but nowhere near THE BIG MASTER BITCH who's known as bush. From the scale of 1-10, Musharraf is scale 1 bitch and bush is obviously scale 10 bitch, Blair comes somewhere around 9-10 and Sharon and the Saudi Prince come around 8-9. ALL BITCHES, we need to put them all in a boat and make them have a tea party.
Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2005 6:25 am
by Americanluvunit
Umer wrote:yea, he's still not as freaking crazy as bush but he's a sell out, actually the economy under him has been better since he came into power and he's actually pretty stable in the head, still a sellout bitch, but nowhere near THE BIG MASTER BITCH who's known as bush. From the scale of 1-10, Musharraf is scale 1 bitch and bush is obviously scale 10 bitch, Blair comes somewhere around 9-10 and Sharon and the Saudi Prince come around 8-9. ALL BITCHES, we need to put them all in a boat and make them have a tea party.
India would be better off with our 16's.
Less Muslims in India.
Therefore less drama.
AMERICANLUVUNIT
Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2005 2:36 pm
by Umer
For you information, India is the one who has been threatening Pakistan for the past decades, that's why Pakistan had to make nuclear weapons to let them know that it is ready too. India tested it's nuclear missles first too. I think you need to stick with US history and events, don't let outside things kill your brain cells that are left after all that weed you smoked during high school.
Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2005 3:34 pm
by Americanluvunit
Umer wrote:For you information, India is the one who has been threatening Pakistan for the past decades, that's why Pakistan had to make nuclear weapons to let them know that it is ready too. India tested it's nuclear missles first too. I think you need to stick with US history and events, don't let outside things kill your brain cells that are left after all that weed you smoked during high school.
Regardless Umer
Im still right.
AMERICANLUVUNIT
Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2005 4:14 pm
by Umer
Umm no you're not, India developed nuclears before Pakistan did so they created the drama. And for your information, if you want to talk about drama, look at your country, russia and north korea, now THATS DRAMA.
ok
Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 9:51 pm
by Americanluvunit
Shithead wrote:Umer wrote:For you information, India is the one who has been threatening Pakistan for the past decades, that's why Pakistan had to make nuclear weapons to let them know that it is ready too. India tested it's nuclear missles first too. I think you need to stick with US history and events, don't let outside things kill your brain cells that are left after all that weed you smoked during high school.
I don't see how this relate to Americanluvit's post at all

Umer should make sure he reads this.
AMERICANLUVUNIT

Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2005 12:15 am
by Umer
Shithead wrote:Umer wrote:For you information, India is the one who has been threatening Pakistan for the past decades, that's why Pakistan had to make nuclear weapons to let them know that it is ready too. India tested it's nuclear missles first too. I think you need to stick with US history and events, don't let outside things kill your brain cells that are left after all that weed you smoked during high school.
I don't see how this relate to Americanluvit's post at all

If you notice, Americanlununit started this off-topic discussion, and he got my answer, read it from the start how he drifted the subject away.
ok
Posted: Sun Mar 27, 2005 7:18 am
by Americanluvunit
Umer wrote:Shithead wrote:Umer wrote:For you information, India is the one who has been threatening Pakistan for the past decades, that's why Pakistan had to make nuclear weapons to let them know that it is ready too. India tested it's nuclear missles first too. I think you need to stick with US history and events, don't let outside things kill your brain cells that are left after all that weed you smoked during high school.
I don't see how this relate to Americanluvit's post at all

If you notice, Americanlununit started this off-topic discussion, and he got my answer, read it from the start how he drifted the subject away.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TELL ME UMER HOW THIS:
"India would be better off with our 16's.
Less Muslims in India.
Therefore less drama."
IS OFF THE SUBJECT OF PAKISTAN GETTING SOME OF OUR F-16's.
AMERICANLUVUNIT

Re: ok
Posted: Sun Mar 27, 2005 8:16 am
by Umer
Americanluvunit wrote:Umer wrote:Shithead wrote:
I don't see how this relate to Americanluvit's post at all

If you notice, Americanlununit started this off-topic discussion, and he got my answer, read it from the start how he drifted the subject away.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TELL ME UMER HOW THIS:
"India would be better off with our 16's.
Less Muslims in India.
Therefore less drama."
IS OFF THE SUBJECT OF PAKISTAN GETTING SOME OF OUR F-16's.
AMERICANLUVUNIT

I didn't say it was off-topic until shithead said that it was, and I didn't want to argue him so I told him that you asked me the question and I answered it. I don't usually bitch about people being off the subject because there are usually many things behind one subject.