U.S. officials highlight progress in Iraq

Anynews unrelated to Terrorism

Moderators: Cell_Leader, ikaotiki, Julstar

User avatar
wewant2no2
Major General [O-8]
Posts: 2739
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 5:00 am

U.S. officials highlight progress in Iraq

Post by wewant2no2 »

U.S. officials highlight progress in Iraq

BAGHDAD — U.S. Army Brig. Gen. Kevin J. Bergner, spokesman for Multi-National Force-Iraq and Daniel Speckhard, Charge D’Affaires to the U.S. Embassy, Baghdad, held a press conference Wednesday at the Combined Press Information Center.

Bergner began the conference by condemning Monday’s attack at the al-Mansour Hotel, which killed 13 Iraqis and wounded 17 others.

“This attack on Iraqis who sought peace and reconciliation is an affront to all people and further proof of the barbaric nature of al-Qaeda,” he said.

Bergner explained his belief that the attack was definitely carried out by al-Qaeda operatives.

“There is no basis of evidence to support some of the earlier speculation that this was other than an al-Qaeda attack,” he said. “In fact, they have since publicly claimed responsibility for the attack.”

Despite the tragedy at al-Mansour, Bergner noted it was a productive week for Coalition forces. Multi-National Corps-Iraq are on day 12 of Operation Phantom Thunder, a Coalition offensive in and around Baghdad.

Bergner said the operation is moving forward, but real progress will take time.

“It will not be like turning on a light switch,” he said. “It will be more gradual, and it will occasionally come with setbacks.”

Bergner highlighted several recent accomplishments, including an operation on Saturday south of Hawija in the al-Tamin province where Coalition forces killed two senior al-Qaeda leaders. One helped smuggle insurgents into Iraq for al-Qaeda operations. The other leader was a courier for the same al-Qaeda cell and was a close associate to other senior leaders within al-Qaeda.

Bergner also praised the work of Iraqi security forces and Coalition forces in Baqubah. They discovered a house used for executions and an illegal prison Monday. Days earlier, Coalition forces discovered a torture chamber and an illegal courthouse linked to al-Qaeda. Soldiers also recently discovered a medical clinic for terrorists nearby.

Coalition forces discovered a large stockpile of rocket-propelled grenades and other munitions. A vehicle-borne improvised explosive device was also discovered outside. The amount of insurgent activity and close proximity to each other implies al-Qaeda was planning on using Baquba as a stronghold, Bergner said.

“This array of facilities is an example of how the enemy seeks to consolidate and create an operating base from which they can conduct attacks on the local population and launch spectacular attacks into Baghdad,” he said. “It is further evidence of the importance of applying pressure simultaneously in and around Baghdad to remove extremist safe havens and operating bases.”

Bergner praised the efforts of Iraqi forces in securing the streets of Iraq as well as their nation’s future. :wink:

:arrow: :wink: Bergner turned the conference over to Speckhard, who will soon depart Iraq. Bergner thanked him publicly for his nearly two years of service to the people of Iraq. Speckhard then highlighted efforts to “promote security, stability and a return to prosperity in Iraq.”

Speckhard spoke of strengthened efforts beyond the International Zone, focusing on building and supporting moderates at local levels in Iraq, improving security to support the Iraqi government and to decrease unemployment particularly amongst young people in Iraq.

“What I’ve seen over the past few months is significant progress in each of these areas, not without challenges, not without problems but really significant progress,” he said.

(U.S. Army story by Sgt. Matthew McLaughlin, Combined Press Information Center)

In other developments throughout Iraq:

Iraqi Security Forces detained five suspected members of an Al Qaeda cell during an operation near Mosul June 25.

http://www.mnf-iraq.com/index.php?optio ... &Itemid=18

Take care...
User avatar
guest
Lieutenant General [O-9]
Posts: 3476
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 5:00 am
Location: Old Europe

Post by guest »

Bergner praised the efforts of Iraqi forces in securing the streets of Iraq as well as their nation’s future.
:arrow: Iraqi security not ready despite training - report

But to be honest, there is not just death and carnage in Iraq. There are also positive effects:

GOOD: It is much cheaper to rent a house after millions of Iraqis fled.

GOOD: You can tip off your local milita when youreighbor is getting on your nerves.

GOOD: You can send your family to the next market place when they go on your nerves.

GOOD: Your water and electricity bill is a low as never.

Maybe others know more positive effects?
User avatar
wewant2no2
Major General [O-8]
Posts: 2739
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 5:00 am

Post by wewant2no2 »

You seem to really like making fun of the Iraqi people!! WHY is that? I have told you a few times that I have a good IRAQI friend living in Baghdad, TWO places he works have been blown up by carbombs, he was hit both times by flying glass and shrapnel. People he worked with for years died in both those bombings. He phoned ME crying, and he lives thousands of miles from me. I wish YOU were in his shoes for just one day, then I think you just might understand that this is NO laughing matter, because he is scared shi*less for his wife and child, and for ALL his countries people.

If the Idiots Terror groups like A.Q. and a few others would STOP this senseless killings of the innocent people in Iraq, and STOP blowing up everything they fu**ing touch, "including themselves" progress would be a-hell-of-a lot faster for the Iraq people. Wouldn't YOU say?

Take care...
User avatar
MaxPower
Brigadier General [O-7]
Posts: 2414
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 4:00 am
Location: Center of kuffars

Post by MaxPower »

84739579 wrote:
Bergner praised the efforts of Iraqi forces in securing the streets of Iraq as well as their nation’s future.
:arrow: Iraqi security not ready despite training - report

But to be honest, there is not just death and carnage in Iraq. There are also positive effects:

GOOD: It is much cheaper to rent a house after millions of Iraqis fled.

GOOD: You can tip off your local milita when youreighbor is getting on your nerves.

GOOD: You can send your family to the next market place when they go on your nerves.

GOOD: Your water and electricity bill is a low as never.

Maybe others know more positive effects?

HA HA HA HA HA HA! This is why I like you and consider you cool. 8) The market and neighbor lines were the best :wink:
Homer Simpson- “‘Kids, there’s three ways to do things: the right way, the wrong way, and the Max Power way.’”

Bart Simpson- “‘Isn’t that the wrong way?’”

Homer Simpson- “‘Yeah, but faster.’
User avatar
MaxPower
Brigadier General [O-7]
Posts: 2414
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 4:00 am
Location: Center of kuffars

Post by MaxPower »

wewant2no2 wrote:You seem to really like making fun of the Iraqi people!! WHY is that? I have told you a few times that I have a good IRAQI friend living in Baghdad, TWO places he works have been blown up by carbombs, he was hit both times by flying glass and shrapnel. People he worked with for years died in both those bombings. He phoned ME crying, and he lives thousands of miles from me. I wish YOU were in his shoes for just one day, then I think you just might understand that this is NO laughing matter, because he is scared shi*less for his wife and child, and for ALL his countries people.

If the Idiots Terror groups like A.Q. and a few others would STOP this senseless killings of the innocent people in Iraq, and STOP blowing up everything they fu**ing touch, "including themselves" progress would be a-hell-of-a lot faster for the Iraq people. Wouldn't YOU say?

Take care...
Yes, but if Bush hadn't invaded the country, Iraq would be safe and sound right now.
Homer Simpson- “‘Kids, there’s three ways to do things: the right way, the wrong way, and the Max Power way.’”

Bart Simpson- “‘Isn’t that the wrong way?’”

Homer Simpson- “‘Yeah, but faster.’
User avatar
wewant2no2
Major General [O-8]
Posts: 2739
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 5:00 am

Post by wewant2no2 »

MaxPower wrote:Yes, but if Bush hadn't invaded the country, Iraq would be safe and sound right now.
If the US had taken out Saddam a bit sooner then:

Genocide of the Marsh Arabs would have never happened. Plus the marshlands would still be intact.

Saddams killing fields would not have had 10s of thousands of innocent men, women, and kids laying mass graves all across Iraq.

10s of thousands of Kurds would not have gotten gassed.

Women and children who were raped by Saddam's Republican Guards would be still alive.

The mentally ill and the disabled that the Baath party killed would be still alive.

There are tons more...

BUT you know what? IF United States had acted earlier to stop it all, then they would still be blamed as they are blamed now..

Take care...
User avatar
TagemandBagem
Colonel [O-6]
Posts: 1922
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 5:00 am

Post by TagemandBagem »

wewant2no2 wrote: BUT you know what? IF United States had acted earlier to stop it all, then they would still be blamed as they are blamed now..

Take care...
Give me a break. The CIA supported and trained Saddam as their little assassin in Baghdad and they helped his rise to power. The U.S. supported him throughout his murders, rapes and genocides. THAT is why they are rightly blamed.

The fact they botched the second Iraq invasion and are responsible for the further deaths of hundreds of thousands more Iraqis is just another big mark against them.
User avatar
guest
Lieutenant General [O-9]
Posts: 3476
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 5:00 am
Location: Old Europe

Post by guest »

wewant2no2 wrote:
MaxPower wrote:Yes, but if Bush hadn't invaded the country, Iraq would be safe and sound right now.
If the US had taken out Saddam a bit sooner then:

Then he would have not fought their proxy war against Iran.

Genocide of the Marsh Arabs would have never happened. Plus the marshlands would still be intact.

Right. If the US would not have urged them to rise against Saddam and then refused to help them.

Saddams killing fields would not have had 10s of thousands of innocent men, women, and kids laying mass graves all across Iraq.

Remember the war and the uprising. Not every one of them was innocent.

10s of thousands of Kurds would not have gotten gassed.

With chemical weapons sold to him by western countries. Plus it happened in a war and they were not loyal to him.

Women and children who were raped by Saddam's Republican Guards would be still alive.

Women and Children who now get raped by militias and criminals would be alive if the US would have not invaded. Or maybe not. But where´s the difference between a milita man raping and killing you or a Republican Guard member?

The mentally ill and the disabled that the Baath party killed would be still alive.

Did i miss anything? Are you talking about Euthanasia?

There are tons more...

BUT you know what? IF United States had acted earlier to stop it all, then they would still be blamed as they are blamed now..

IF they would have not armed him to his teeth Saddam would have been not more than an average Middle Eastern dictator.

Take care...
@MaxPower: 8) :wink: [/url]
User avatar
abuyemeni
First Sergeant [E-8 Grade]
Posts: 537
Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2005 4:00 am

Post by abuyemeni »

wewant2no2
If the Idiots Terror groups like A.Q. and a few others would STOP this senseless killings of the innocent people in Iraq, and STOP blowing up everything they fu**ing touch, "including themselves" progress would be a-hell-of-a lot faster for the Iraq people. Wouldn't YOU say?
You mean by progresss,..Let this criminal Shia gouvermant commit genocide against the sunni's,...???

Removing this criminal Shia gouvermant and all it's gangmembers, That's progress,..

You should tell your friend in Iraq to stop crying and be a man,..ISI is taking controle over this country and you either with them or against them,...
User avatar
TagemandBagem
Colonel [O-6]
Posts: 1922
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 5:00 am

Post by TagemandBagem »

abuyemeni wrote:ISI is taking controle over this country and you either with them or against them,...
ISI is not going to take control of Iraq. That's something you can bet your house on.
User avatar
abuyemeni
First Sergeant [E-8 Grade]
Posts: 537
Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2005 4:00 am

Post by abuyemeni »

ISI is not going to take control of Iraq. That's something you can bet your house on.
Well that's a bet,..

I hope you got a nice hous,..
User avatar
TagemandBagem
Colonel [O-6]
Posts: 1922
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 5:00 am

Post by TagemandBagem »

abuyemeni wrote:
ISI is not going to take control of Iraq. That's something you can bet your house on.
Well that's a bet,..

I hope you got a nice hous,..
Screencapped for future victory. :D
User avatar
guest
Lieutenant General [O-9]
Posts: 3476
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 5:00 am
Location: Old Europe

Post by guest »

TagemandBagem wrote:Screencapped for future victory. :D
:lol:

Let´s stick to reality, ISI is never going to control the whole of Iraq. Shia dominance in the south and (secular) Kurdish dominance in the north are too strong. Maybe they will rule in the parts which they declared as their Islamic State of Iraq. But i bet a few certain countries would prefer to annihilate all life there before they accept that.
User avatar
wewant2no2
Major General [O-8]
Posts: 2739
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 5:00 am

Post by wewant2no2 »

TagemandBagem wrote:
wewant2no2 wrote: BUT you know what? IF United States had acted earlier to stop it all, then they would still be blamed as they are blamed now..

Take care...
Give me a break. The CIA supported and trained Saddam as their little assassin in Baghdad and they helped his rise to power. The U.S. supported him throughout his murders, rapes and genocides. THAT is why they are rightly blamed.

The fact they botched the second Iraq invasion and are responsible for the further deaths of hundreds of thousands more Iraqis is just another big mark against them.
Show me a "VERY" reliable source that the CIA supported and trained Saddam.

Take care...
User avatar
wewant2no2
Major General [O-8]
Posts: 2739
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 5:00 am

Post by wewant2no2 »

84739579 wrote:
wewant2no2 wrote:
MaxPower wrote:Yes, but if Bush hadn't invaded the country, Iraq would be safe and sound right now.
If the US had taken out Saddam a bit sooner then:

Then he would have not fought their proxy war against Iran.

Genocide of the Marsh Arabs would have never happened. Plus the marshlands would still be intact.

Right. If the US would not have urged them to rise against Saddam and then refused to help them.

Saddams killing fields would not have had 10s of thousands of innocent men, women, and kids laying mass graves all across Iraq.

Remember the war and the uprising. Not every one of them was innocent.

10s of thousands of Kurds would not have gotten gassed.

With chemical weapons sold to him by western countries. Plus it happened in a war and they were not loyal to him.

Women and children who were raped by Saddam's Republican Guards would be still alive.

Women and Children who now get raped by militias and criminals would be alive if the US would have not invaded. Or maybe not. But where´s the difference between a milita man raping and killing you or a Republican Guard member?

The mentally ill and the disabled that the Baath party killed would be still alive.

Did i miss anything? Are you talking about Euthanasia?

There are tons more...

BUT you know what? IF United States had acted earlier to stop it all, then they would still be blamed as they are blamed now..

IF they would have not armed him to his teeth Saddam would have been not more than an average Middle Eastern dictator.

Take care...
@MaxPower: 8) :wink: [/url]
I would like to SEE ALL your sources! AND do make them reliable source's!

Thanks!! :wink:

Take care...
Last edited by wewant2no2 on Fri Jun 29, 2007 4:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply